Kelley Kronenberg Partner/Business Unit Leader Paul Milberg and Attorney Benjamin Lazarus secured a decisive appellate victory when the Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed summary judgment for their condominium association client, eliminating over $1,500,000.00 in potential exposure from a premises liability claim. 

The case arose from an alleged slip and fall incident in a stairwell at a condominium property. The plaintiff filed suit against the condominium association seeking substantial damages for injuries that included significant medical bills. Despite the plaintiff undergoing medical examination that revealed substantial injuries, Paul and Benjamin recognized that liability—not damages—would be the key battleground. 

In the trial court proceedings in Pinellas County Circuit Court, the defense team filed a motion for summary judgment targeting the fundamental elements of premises liability. Under Florida law, to establish premises liability, a plaintiff must prove: (1) the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff; (2) the defendant breached that duty; (3) the breach was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries; and (4) the plaintiff suffered damages. 

For property owners, this duty arises only when there is a dangerous condition on the premises and the owner had actual or constructive notice of that condition. Constructive notice requires showing the condition existed for a sufficient length of time that the owner should have known about it in the exercise of reasonable care. 

Paul and Benjamin’s strategy focused on demonstrating that the plaintiff could not establish either the existence of a dangerous condition or the association’s notice of any hazard. Through discovery and case development, they established a record showing no evidence supported these essential elements of the claim. 

The trial court agreed and granted summary judgment in favor of the condominium association. The plaintiff, represented by experienced counsel from a prominent plaintiffs firm, appealed to the Second District Court of Appeal. 

On appeal, Paul argued before the appellate panel while Benjamin crafted a compelling answer brief that methodically addressed the plaintiff’s appellate arguments. Their brief emphasized foundational Florida premises liability case law and highlighted the plaintiff’s fundamental inability to meet their burden of proof on liability. 

The answer brief demonstrated that the plaintiff had failed to produce any evidence establishing what dangerous condition allegedly caused the fall or how the condominium association had actual or constructive notice of any such condition. Without evidence on these threshold liability issues, no genuine issue of material fact existed, and summary judgment was proper as a matter of law. 

The appellate panel—consisting of Judge Edward C. LaRose, Judge Anthony K. Black, and Judge Andrea Teves Smith—agreed with the defense position and affirmed the summary judgment in its entirety. 

Following the appellate victory, Paul and Benjamin moved for entitlement to appellate attorney’s fees, arguing that the plaintiff’s appeal lacked merit and the association was entitled to recover its costs of defending the frivolous appeal. The appellate court granted this motion, adding to the trial court’s earlier award of entitlement to attorney’s fees and costs at the summary judgment stage. 

This complete victory eliminated the association’s $1,500,000.00 exposure, avoided the costs and uncertainty of trial, and resulted in the client’s entitlement to recover its legal fees and costs at both the trial and appellate levels. The dual fee awards provide additional vindication of the defense position and may serve to deter similar unmeritorious claims in the future. 

For condominium associations and property owners, this case demonstrates that premises liability claims can be defeated at summary judgment when plaintiffs fail to produce evidence of both a dangerous condition and notice. The case also reinforces that successful summary judgment defense may position defendants to recover their attorney’s fees, particularly when appellate affirmance confirms the lack of merit in the underlying claims. 

The victory showcases the effectiveness of coordinated trial and appellate strategy, with focused motion practice at the trial level creating a strong record for appellate affirmance and strategic appellate briefing preserving that victory on appeal. 

Stay up to date on the latest developments in general liability and third-party insurance. Click here to read the latest issue of our newsletter, “In the Know: General Liability Edition.”   

Learn more about Kelley Kronenberg’s General Liability and Third-Party Insurance Defense Division. Click here.