Blogs
Our team addresses the pressing questions you’re facing, breaks down recent legal developments, and provides timely guidance on the issues impacting your business, industry, and personal protection. From emerging trends to case law analysis, our attorneys share their expertise to help you navigate complex legal landscapes with confidence. Check back often for new posts.
Sports Entertainment & Media
Another Example of “No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: Your Workers’ Comp Light Duty Assignments May Haunt You
Walmart just got slapped with an EEOC lawsuit for doing what every HR director in Florida gets told to do—provide light duty work for injured employees. After 30+ years representing employers in workplace disputes, I’ve seen plenty of companies get burned for trying to do the right thing, but this EEOC workers compensation case should wake up every HR manager.
Here’s what happened: Walmart provided a light duty assignment to an injured worker for 14 years. Fourteen years! Then they discontinued it, and the EEOC swooped in claiming the company violated the Americans with Disabilities Act. The agency’s theory? That 14-year light duty assignment had magically transformed into the employee’s permanent job and ending it constituted disability discrimination.
According to the EEOC’s Complaint, Walmart didn’t set any time limits on their workers’ comp light duty program. If correct, this caused an unstructured approach to ending/ managing light duty assignments and cost them a federal lawsuit and who knows how much in legal fees (assuming they win, which isn’t guaranteed, especially in the Northern District of California).
When Workers Comp Light Duty Becomes an ADA Accommodation
Most Florida employers understand the workers compensation drill. Employee gets hurt, you scramble to find light duty work that fits their restrictions, everybody wins—or so you think. The injured worker stays productive (and does not sit on a couch watching lawyer ads), your workers comp costs stay lower, and you look like the good guy.
But here’s the trap nobody talks about: provide that workplace accommodation long enough and without any structure on its duration, and the EEOC might decide you’ve created a new job classification. Suddenly, your temporary workers comp solution becomes a permanent ADA obligation.
The Walmart EEOC case highlights exactly how this happens. An accommodation that starts as a short-term workers compensation cost-control measure can evolve into something much more complicated from a disability discrimination perspective.
Hidden Risks HR Directors Face with Light Duty Policies
After three decades of handling these workplace accommodation situations, I know which mistakes get companies sued. Here are the landmines most HR departments don’t even know they’re stepping on:
The Accommodation Precedent Problem: Once you modify a workplace for one employee, other employees with similar limitations might argue you’ve established that accommodation as standard, financially acceptable practice. If you can do it for the workers comp case, why not for an individual with limitations not linked to a workplace injury?
The Time Trap: The longer you maintain a light duty assignment, the harder it becomes to argue it’s temporary. Fourteen years definitely crosses that line, but even assignments lasting months can create EEOC compliance problems.
The Documentation Gap: Most companies document workers comp restrictions but fail to document the temporary nature of light duty assignments, evaluate whether the temporary assignment continues to be necessary or have a system to handle the transition back to a “regular” job. Without clear written workplace accommodation policies and time limits, you’re setting yourself up for exactly what happened to Walmart.
The Policy Vacuum: Many employers have detailed workers compensation procedures but no formal light duty policy. This creates confusion about when assignments should end and opens the door for EEOC complaints.
What Smart Employers Do Before EEOC Investigation
Companies that avoid these problems take action before situations explode. Based on decades of experience defending employers in EEOC cases, here’s what actually works:
Establish Clear Light Duty Time Limits: Your workers comp policy should specify maximum duration for light duty assignments—typically 90 to 180 days. Document this limit in writing and communicate it to the employee upfront. The assignment can be reauthorized in these increments.
Separate Workers Comp from ADA Processes: Make it clear that workers’ compensation light duty assignments are temporary measures, not permanent workplace accommodations. Use different forms, procedures, and documentation for each.
Regular Review Requirements: Build in mandatory review periods to evaluate whether light duty assignments should continue, be modified, or end. Don’t let assignments drift indefinitely without HR oversight.
Written Agreements: Document the temporary nature of light duty work in writing. Have employees acknowledge that these assignments may end when workers compensation concludes or business needs change.
Sometimes, it’s appropriate to put someone out on leave. Light duty is not for every situation. Have some more tools in the HR/Comp toolbox.
Consider limiting the number of light duty positions active at any time in a location.
Consider whether the employee can do their regular job with reasonable assistance/accommodation. IF they can, there is no need for “light duty.”
Interactive Process Complications with EEOC Compliance
Here’s where things get really tricky. If an employee’s workers comp case resolves but they still have permanent restrictions, the employer will need to engage in the ADA interactive process. This means the temporary light duty assignment could lead to requests for permanent reasonable accommodations.
The key is managing this transition properly. You need clear procedures for evaluating whether temporary light duty work can become a permanent accommodation, and when business necessity allows you to say no.
Most HR departments handle the workers compensation piece just fine. It’s the transition to potential ADA obligations where things go sideways and create EEOC exposure.
What the Walmart EEOC Decision Could Mean for HR Directors
Walmart will probably fight this case hard, and they might win. But even if they do, the litigation costs are substantial. More importantly, this EEOC lawsuit signals the agency’s willingness to challenge long-term light duty arrangements as potential ADA violations.
The EEOC is clearly watching how employers handle the intersection of workers comp and disability accommodations. Cases like this put all employers on notice that informal, unlimited light duty programs create legal exposure.
Your Light Duty Policy Needs Updates for EEOC Compliance
If your current light duty policy is more than two years old, or if you don’t have written policies at all, you’re asking for EEOC trouble. The intersection of workers comp and ADA requirements changes constantly, and informal practices won’t protect you in federal court.
Review your current approach and ask these critical questions:
Do you have written time limits for light duty assignments? Are your workers’ comp and ADA procedures clearly separated? Do employees understand that light duty work is temporary? Have you trained supervisors on managing the transition from workers compensation to potential ADA obligations?
If you answered no to any of these questions, you need legal help before you become the next EEOC headline.
Don’t Wait Until EEOC Investigation Starts
The Walmart EEOC case shows that even large companies with sophisticated HR departments can stumble on these workplace accommodation issues. If it can happen to them, it can happen to you.
These problems are completely preventable with proper policies and procedures. Most companies wait until they’re facing an EEOC complaint to fix their light duty programs, but that’s too late.
The intersection of workers compensation and disability accommodation law creates traps for unwary employers. The EEOC knows this and actively looks for violations in this area.
Contact David Harvey for Light Duty Policy Legal Help
Don’t let your company become the next EEOC target for trying to do the right thing. As a labor and employment attorney at Kelley Kronenberg with decades of experience representing employers in EEOC cases, I help Florida businesses navigate the complex intersection of workers compensation and disability accommodation requirements.
As part of Kelley Kronenberg’s Business Legal Team, I work across practice areas to provide comprehensive, holistic, and proactive legal counsel. I collaborate directly with our workers’ compensation attorneys to guide our clients through the intersection of employment law and workers comp issues, ensuring coordinated strategies that protect your business from multiple angles.
Whether you need to update existing light duty policies, handle a current situation with an injured employee, or understand how changing EEOC enforcement affects your workers comp programs, I provide practical guidance that protects your business interests while maintaining compliant practices.
The Walmart EEOC lawsuit proves that good intentions aren’t enough—you need proper documentation and procedures to avoid federal discrimination claims. Let’s review your current policies and make sure you’re protected before the EEOC comes knocking.
David S. Harvey
Partner, Labor & Employment
Kelley Kronenberg-Tampa, FL
(813) 223-1697
Email
Bio
David S. Harvey practices labor and employment law at Kelley Kronenberg, where he counsels employers on workplace compliance, disability accommodations, and EEOC defense matters. He represents Florida businesses across all industries in employment-related disputes and compliance issues.
Walmart just got slapped with an EEOC lawsuit for doing what every HR director in Florida gets told to do—provide light duty work for injured employees. After 30+ years representing employers in workplace disputes, I’ve seen plenty of companies get burned for trying to do the right thing, but this EEOC workers compensation case should wake up every HR manager.
Here’s what happened: Walmart provided a light duty assignment to an injured worker for 14 years. Fourteen years! Then they discontinued it, and the EEOC swooped in claiming the company violated the Americans with Disabilities Act. The agency’s theory? That 14-year light duty assignment had magically transformed into the employee’s permanent job and ending it constituted disability discrimination.
According to the EEOC’s Complaint, Walmart didn’t set any time limits on their workers’ comp light duty program. If correct, this caused an unstructured approach to ending/ managing light duty assignments and cost them a federal lawsuit and who knows how much in legal fees (assuming they win, which isn’t guaranteed, especially in the Northern District of California).
When Workers Comp Light Duty Becomes an ADA Accommodation
Most Florida employers understand the workers compensation drill. Employee gets hurt, you scramble to find light duty work that fits their restrictions, everybody wins—or so you think. The injured worker stays productive (and does not sit on a couch watching lawyer ads), your workers comp costs stay lower, and you look like the good guy.
But here’s the trap nobody talks about: provide that workplace accommodation long enough and without any structure on its duration, and the EEOC might decide you’ve created a new job classification. Suddenly, your temporary workers comp solution becomes a permanent ADA obligation.
The Walmart EEOC case highlights exactly how this happens. An accommodation that starts as a short-term workers compensation cost-control measure can evolve into something much more complicated from a disability discrimination perspective.
Hidden Risks HR Directors Face with Light Duty Policies
After three decades of handling these workplace accommodation situations, I know which mistakes get companies sued. Here are the landmines most HR departments don’t even know they’re stepping on:
The Accommodation Precedent Problem: Once you modify a workplace for one employee, other employees with similar limitations might argue you’ve established that accommodation as standard, financially acceptable practice. If you can do it for the workers comp case, why not for an individual with limitations not linked to a workplace injury?
The Time Trap: The longer you maintain a light duty assignment, the harder it becomes to argue it’s temporary. Fourteen years definitely crosses that line, but even assignments lasting months can create EEOC compliance problems.
The Documentation Gap: Most companies document workers comp restrictions but fail to document the temporary nature of light duty assignments, evaluate whether the temporary assignment continues to be necessary or have a system to handle the transition back to a “regular” job. Without clear written workplace accommodation policies and time limits, you’re setting yourself up for exactly what happened to Walmart.
The Policy Vacuum: Many employers have detailed workers compensation procedures but no formal light duty policy. This creates confusion about when assignments should end and opens the door for EEOC complaints.
What Smart Employers Do Before EEOC Investigation
Companies that avoid these problems take action before situations explode. Based on decades of experience defending employers in EEOC cases, here’s what actually works:
Establish Clear Light Duty Time Limits: Your workers comp policy should specify maximum duration for light duty assignments—typically 90 to 180 days. Document this limit in writing and communicate it to the employee upfront. The assignment can be reauthorized in these increments.
Separate Workers Comp from ADA Processes: Make it clear that workers’ compensation light duty assignments are temporary measures, not permanent workplace accommodations. Use different forms, procedures, and documentation for each.
Regular Review Requirements: Build in mandatory review periods to evaluate whether light duty assignments should continue, be modified, or end. Don’t let assignments drift indefinitely without HR oversight.
Written Agreements: Document the temporary nature of light duty work in writing. Have employees acknowledge that these assignments may end when workers compensation concludes or business needs change.
Sometimes, it’s appropriate to put someone out on leave. Light duty is not for every situation. Have some more tools in the HR/Comp toolbox.
Consider limiting the number of light duty positions active at any time in a location.
Consider whether the employee can do their regular job with reasonable assistance/accommodation. IF they can, there is no need for “light duty.”
Interactive Process Complications with EEOC Compliance
Here’s where things get really tricky. If an employee’s workers comp case resolves but they still have permanent restrictions, the employer will need to engage in the ADA interactive process. This means the temporary light duty assignment could lead to requests for permanent reasonable accommodations.
The key is managing this transition properly. You need clear procedures for evaluating whether temporary light duty work can become a permanent accommodation, and when business necessity allows you to say no.
Most HR departments handle the workers compensation piece just fine. It’s the transition to potential ADA obligations where things go sideways and create EEOC exposure.
What the Walmart EEOC Decision Could Mean for HR Directors
Walmart will probably fight this case hard, and they might win. But even if they do, the litigation costs are substantial. More importantly, this EEOC lawsuit signals the agency’s willingness to challenge long-term light duty arrangements as potential ADA violations.
The EEOC is clearly watching how employers handle the intersection of workers comp and disability accommodations. Cases like this put all employers on notice that informal, unlimited light duty programs create legal exposure.
Your Light Duty Policy Needs Updates for EEOC Compliance
If your current light duty policy is more than two years old, or if you don’t have written policies at all, you’re asking for EEOC trouble. The intersection of workers comp and ADA requirements changes constantly, and informal practices won’t protect you in federal court.
Review your current approach and ask these critical questions:
Do you have written time limits for light duty assignments? Are your workers’ comp and ADA procedures clearly separated? Do employees understand that light duty work is temporary? Have you trained supervisors on managing the transition from workers compensation to potential ADA obligations?
If you answered no to any of these questions, you need legal help before you become the next EEOC headline.
Don’t Wait Until EEOC Investigation Starts
The Walmart EEOC case shows that even large companies with sophisticated HR departments can stumble on these workplace accommodation issues. If it can happen to them, it can happen to you.
These problems are completely preventable with proper policies and procedures. Most companies wait until they’re facing an EEOC complaint to fix their light duty programs, but that’s too late.
The intersection of workers compensation and disability accommodation law creates traps for unwary employers. The EEOC knows this and actively looks for violations in this area.
Contact David Harvey for Light Duty Policy Legal Help
Don’t let your company become the next EEOC target for trying to do the right thing. As a labor and employment attorney at Kelley Kronenberg with decades of experience representing employers in EEOC cases, I help Florida businesses navigate the complex intersection of workers compensation and disability accommodation requirements.
As part of Kelley Kronenberg’s Business Legal Team, I work across practice areas to provide comprehensive, holistic, and proactive legal counsel. I collaborate directly with our workers’ compensation attorneys to guide our clients through the intersection of employment law and workers comp issues, ensuring coordinated strategies that protect your business from multiple angles.
Whether you need to update existing light duty policies, handle a current situation with an injured employee, or understand how changing EEOC enforcement affects your workers comp programs, I provide practical guidance that protects your business interests while maintaining compliant practices.
The Walmart EEOC lawsuit proves that good intentions aren’t enough—you need proper documentation and procedures to avoid federal discrimination claims. Let’s review your current policies and make sure you’re protected before the EEOC comes knocking.
David S. Harvey
Partner, Labor & Employment
Kelley Kronenberg-Tampa, FL
(813) 223-1697
Email
Bio
David S. Harvey practices labor and employment law at Kelley Kronenberg, where he counsels employers on workplace compliance, disability accommodations, and EEOC defense matters. He represents Florida businesses across all industries in employment-related disputes and compliance issues.