Blogs
Our team addresses the pressing questions you’re facing, breaks down recent legal developments, and provides timely guidance on the issues impacting your business, industry, and personal protection. From emerging trends to case law analysis, our attorneys share their expertise to help you navigate complex legal landscapes with confidence. Check back often for new posts.
Sports Entertainment & Media
Florida Finally Fixes the Statute of Limitations Confusion for Civil Rights Claims
Florida just passed legislation that solves a problem that’s been creating uncertainty for employers and employees since 2000. After 30+ years representing employers in discrimination cases, I can tell you this clarity is long overdue.
The bill passed the legislature and is awaiting Governor DeSantis’s signature. If signed, it takes effect July 1, 2026, and finally answers the question that’s been plaguing Florida Civil Rights Act litigation: how long does an employee actually have to file a lawsuit?
The Problem That’s Cost Employers Years of Uncertainty
Under the Florida Civil Rights Act, employees alleging discrimination must first file a complaint with the Florida Commission on Human Relations. The FCHR has 180 days to investigate and issue a determination. If the FCHR finds reasonable cause, the employee has one year to file a lawsuit.
Simple enough. But that’s not what was happening in practice.
The Florida Supreme Court’s 2000 decision in Joshua v. City of Gainesville created a massive loophole. When the FCHR failed to issue a determination within 180 days, the court said employees got four years to file—using the general statute of limitations for statutory violations instead of the FCRA’s one-year limit.
Four years versus one year is a huge difference for employers. Evidence disappears. Witnesses move on. Memories fade. Cases that should have expired after a year suddenly had life for four more years.
In 2020, the legislature tried to fix this with HB 255, which said employees only get one year even when the FCHR doesn’t issue a determination within 180 days. That helped, but it didn’t solve the whole problem.
The EEOC Complication Nobody Solved
Here’s where it gets worse. Florida and the EEOC have a work-sharing agreement. Employees can dual-file discrimination charges with both agencies. When they do, the EEOC typically conducts the investigation, not the FCHR.
The EEOC issues Notices of Right to Sue, not Florida reasonable cause determinations. Some Florida courts held that when the EEOC handled the investigation and issued a Notice of Right to Sue, the 2020 fix didn’t apply because there was no state commission notice triggering the statute of limitations.
This created the potential for a four-year statute of limitations on dual-filed cases investigated by the EEOC. I’ve handled cases where employers thought claims were long dead, only to get sued years later because the employee dual-filed with the EEOC and a court decided the extended limitation period applied.
The uncertainty was expensive. Employers couldn’t close the books on potential liability. Document retention policies had to account for potentially stale claims. Settlement negotiations became complicated when nobody could agree on whether claims were even timely.
What the New Bill Actually Does
The legislation awaiting the Governor’s signature creates clear, predictable deadlines that work regardless of which agency investigates.
An employee must file their lawsuit within one year of whichever comes first: a reasonable cause determination by the FCHR or a Notice of Right to Sue from the EEOC.
If neither the FCHR nor the EEOC issues a determination or Notice of Right to Sue within 180 days of filing the charge, the employee has 18 months from filing the charge to file a lawsuit.
That’s it. No ambiguity. No court interpretation needed. Maximum 18 months from filing the administrative charge.
Why This Matters for Florida Employers
Certainty. Employers now know exactly when potential liability expires. Eighteen months from the date the employee files their FCHR charge, claims are time-barred unless the FCHR or EEOC issued a determination or Notice of Right to Sue earlier.
This affects document retention, settlement strategy, and risk assessment. You can close files. You can stop worrying about stale claims resurfacing. You know definitively whether an employee’s lawsuit was filed timely.
For companies operating in Florida with 15 or more employees, this is welcome clarity after years of litigation about litigation deadlines.
Federal Claims Aren’t Affected
The new statute of limitations only applies to Florida Civil Rights Act claims. Employees still have their federal rights under Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and other federal statutes. Those federal claims have their own statutes of limitations that this Florida legislation doesn’t touch.
But most discrimination complaints filed in Florida include both state and federal claims. Knowing that the state claims definitively expire 18 months after filing eliminates a significant uncertainty in evaluating case exposure.
Implementation Timeline
If Governor DeSantis signs the bill, it becomes effective July 1, 2026. The new deadlines will apply to charges filed on or after that date.
Charges pending before July 1, 2026 will likely be governed by existing law, though transition questions will need to be resolved. Employers with charges currently pending should work with counsel to determine how the new statute of limitations might affect timing.
What Employers Should Do
Review your document retention policies. The new 18-month maximum allows you to potentially shorten retention periods for some employment-related documents, though you’ll still need to account for federal claim deadlines and other considerations.
Update your litigation hold procedures. When employees file FCHR charges, you can now calculate definitive deadlines for when litigation must be filed or claims expire.
Train HR staff on the new deadlines. Understanding that employees have 18 months maximum (and potentially less if determinations are issued earlier) helps in responding to charges and evaluating settlement.
Work with employment counsel when charges are filed. The new statute of limitations provides clarity, but proper calculation of deadlines still requires careful attention to when charges were filed and when any determinations or Notices of Right to Sue were issued.
The Bigger Picture
Florida has struggled with statute of limitations confusion for Florida Civil Rights Act claims for over two decades. The Joshua decision in 2000 created ambiguity. The 2020 amendment helped but didn’t solve the EEOC problem. This 2026 legislation finally provides the certainty employers and employees both need.
Discrimination claims shouldn’t linger indefinitely. Employees deserve clear deadlines for pursuing their rights. Employers deserve to know when potential liability expires. This legislation accomplishes both.
After 30+ years handling discrimination cases, I can tell you that procedural clarity like this prevents disputes, encourages earlier resolution, and ultimately serves everyone’s interests better than the legal uncertainty we’ve had since 2000.
If you’re a Florida employer with 15 or more employees, this legislation affects how you’ll handle discrimination complaints going forward. Understanding these deadlines and how they interact with federal claim deadlines requires careful attention, but the new clarity is a significant improvement over the uncertainty that’s existed for years.
David S. Harvey
Partner and Business Unit Leader, Labor and Employment
Kelley Kronenberg-Tampa, FL.
(813) 223-1697
Email
Bio
Florida just passed legislation that solves a problem that’s been creating uncertainty for employers and employees since 2000. After 30+ years representing employers in discrimination cases, I can tell you this clarity is long overdue.
The bill passed the legislature and is awaiting Governor DeSantis’s signature. If signed, it takes effect July 1, 2026, and finally answers the question that’s been plaguing Florida Civil Rights Act litigation: how long does an employee actually have to file a lawsuit?
The Problem That’s Cost Employers Years of Uncertainty
Under the Florida Civil Rights Act, employees alleging discrimination must first file a complaint with the Florida Commission on Human Relations. The FCHR has 180 days to investigate and issue a determination. If the FCHR finds reasonable cause, the employee has one year to file a lawsuit.
Simple enough. But that’s not what was happening in practice.
The Florida Supreme Court’s 2000 decision in Joshua v. City of Gainesville created a massive loophole. When the FCHR failed to issue a determination within 180 days, the court said employees got four years to file—using the general statute of limitations for statutory violations instead of the FCRA’s one-year limit.
Four years versus one year is a huge difference for employers. Evidence disappears. Witnesses move on. Memories fade. Cases that should have expired after a year suddenly had life for four more years.
In 2020, the legislature tried to fix this with HB 255, which said employees only get one year even when the FCHR doesn’t issue a determination within 180 days. That helped, but it didn’t solve the whole problem.
The EEOC Complication Nobody Solved
Here’s where it gets worse. Florida and the EEOC have a work-sharing agreement. Employees can dual-file discrimination charges with both agencies. When they do, the EEOC typically conducts the investigation, not the FCHR.
The EEOC issues Notices of Right to Sue, not Florida reasonable cause determinations. Some Florida courts held that when the EEOC handled the investigation and issued a Notice of Right to Sue, the 2020 fix didn’t apply because there was no state commission notice triggering the statute of limitations.
This created the potential for a four-year statute of limitations on dual-filed cases investigated by the EEOC. I’ve handled cases where employers thought claims were long dead, only to get sued years later because the employee dual-filed with the EEOC and a court decided the extended limitation period applied.
The uncertainty was expensive. Employers couldn’t close the books on potential liability. Document retention policies had to account for potentially stale claims. Settlement negotiations became complicated when nobody could agree on whether claims were even timely.
What the New Bill Actually Does
The legislation awaiting the Governor’s signature creates clear, predictable deadlines that work regardless of which agency investigates.
An employee must file their lawsuit within one year of whichever comes first: a reasonable cause determination by the FCHR or a Notice of Right to Sue from the EEOC.
If neither the FCHR nor the EEOC issues a determination or Notice of Right to Sue within 180 days of filing the charge, the employee has 18 months from filing the charge to file a lawsuit.
That’s it. No ambiguity. No court interpretation needed. Maximum 18 months from filing the administrative charge.
Why This Matters for Florida Employers
Certainty. Employers now know exactly when potential liability expires. Eighteen months from the date the employee files their FCHR charge, claims are time-barred unless the FCHR or EEOC issued a determination or Notice of Right to Sue earlier.
This affects document retention, settlement strategy, and risk assessment. You can close files. You can stop worrying about stale claims resurfacing. You know definitively whether an employee’s lawsuit was filed timely.
For companies operating in Florida with 15 or more employees, this is welcome clarity after years of litigation about litigation deadlines.
Federal Claims Aren’t Affected
The new statute of limitations only applies to Florida Civil Rights Act claims. Employees still have their federal rights under Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and other federal statutes. Those federal claims have their own statutes of limitations that this Florida legislation doesn’t touch.
But most discrimination complaints filed in Florida include both state and federal claims. Knowing that the state claims definitively expire 18 months after filing eliminates a significant uncertainty in evaluating case exposure.
Implementation Timeline
If Governor DeSantis signs the bill, it becomes effective July 1, 2026. The new deadlines will apply to charges filed on or after that date.
Charges pending before July 1, 2026 will likely be governed by existing law, though transition questions will need to be resolved. Employers with charges currently pending should work with counsel to determine how the new statute of limitations might affect timing.
What Employers Should Do
Review your document retention policies. The new 18-month maximum allows you to potentially shorten retention periods for some employment-related documents, though you’ll still need to account for federal claim deadlines and other considerations.
Update your litigation hold procedures. When employees file FCHR charges, you can now calculate definitive deadlines for when litigation must be filed or claims expire.
Train HR staff on the new deadlines. Understanding that employees have 18 months maximum (and potentially less if determinations are issued earlier) helps in responding to charges and evaluating settlement.
Work with employment counsel when charges are filed. The new statute of limitations provides clarity, but proper calculation of deadlines still requires careful attention to when charges were filed and when any determinations or Notices of Right to Sue were issued.
The Bigger Picture
Florida has struggled with statute of limitations confusion for Florida Civil Rights Act claims for over two decades. The Joshua decision in 2000 created ambiguity. The 2020 amendment helped but didn’t solve the EEOC problem. This 2026 legislation finally provides the certainty employers and employees both need.
Discrimination claims shouldn’t linger indefinitely. Employees deserve clear deadlines for pursuing their rights. Employers deserve to know when potential liability expires. This legislation accomplishes both.
After 30+ years handling discrimination cases, I can tell you that procedural clarity like this prevents disputes, encourages earlier resolution, and ultimately serves everyone’s interests better than the legal uncertainty we’ve had since 2000.
If you’re a Florida employer with 15 or more employees, this legislation affects how you’ll handle discrimination complaints going forward. Understanding these deadlines and how they interact with federal claim deadlines requires careful attention, but the new clarity is a significant improvement over the uncertainty that’s existed for years.
David S. Harvey
Partner and Business Unit Leader, Labor and Employment
Kelley Kronenberg-Tampa, FL.
(813) 223-1697
Email
Bio